'The controversy of vaccinations has led to a whole industry of advocacy groups - some protesting for "green" vaccines, some for the removal of mercury, others for vaccine choice and even pro-life groups speaking against the use of aborted fetuses in vaccine production. With all of these issues, and fingers pointed at so many potential problems in vaccines, it is easy to miss one of the most important issues of all: Are vaccines even effective or useful to begin with? This is a premise that is assumed to be true in most cases... but what if it's not?
Would there be any need to try to produce vaccines without mercury, without retrovirus contamination, or without infected, aborted fetal tissue? Based on my understanding of the whole theory of vaccination, even if I was offered the "greenest" vaccine, free from the usual heavy metals, contaminants and carcinogens, I would still refuse it, even in the midst of an outbreak. This may seem absurd and even totally extreme to some readers but my position is based on not only science but logic.'
Read more...
Related Post:
Widget by [ Iptek-4u ]
