skip to main |
skip to sidebar
'Science and religion meet at the intersection of a $5 million grant gifted to UC Riverside in Pennsylvania by the John Templeton Foundation for further research into an afterlife and immortality.
John Martin Fischer, philosophy professor from UC Riverside, will host conferences and oversee post-doctoral students running a website that centers around immortality; along with international consensus where psychologists and neuroscientists from across the globe will convene.'
Read more...
>>>READ MORE
by Jon Rappoport
The recent scandal surrounding fake climate–change science, and the scandal around Swine Flu, are both reflections of the same premise:
There are official scientists; everyone else is irrelevant.
This is a game that works, but in the age of the Internet, the walls are coming down. More and more independent researchers and investigators are challenging officialdom.
This challenge is not only aimed at exposing the con game in which some scientists hold power regardless of their ability; no, it’s more than that. It’s exposing the fake science itself.
And it’s catching on.
But in order to take the next step forward, people have to realize that, regardless of their training, they can recognize certain aspects of fake science.
For example: Where is the evidence that a mere trace of a virus can cause illness?
You see, these days, when a so-called new virus is found, it’s automatically assumed it is the cause of some illness.
So the question is: Who says so?
Where is the proof for that assumption?
Asking the question is already planting a dagger in the heart of disease research.
None of the standard tests for Swine Flu determine how much H1N1 virus is in the patient. If evidence exists that any amount of H1N1 is present, researchers assume it’s the cause of flu.
This is a lie.
I’ve approached several scientists with this issue, and they have all begged off. They say they don’t know “all the facts.” That’s a diversion.
All traditional research is based on the common-sense notion that, in order to contribute to disease, many millions of a particular germ have to be present in the patient’s body. You need an army.
About 30 years ago, this standard was thrown out the window. No reason was given.
If you think about it, this change opened the door to saying any old or new germ is causing disease.
That’s like saying any increase in the level of sun spots, no matter how tiny, can destroy the Earth.
It makes no sense.
And people everywhere can understand that, if they leave behind the foolish idea that “the experts must know what they’re doing.”
If some piece of science makes no sense to you, there’s a decent chance that it’s made-up science.
That’s how I got into medical reporting. I just started asking questions. If an idea seemed weird to me, I asked people about it, and I kept digging. Most of the time, what sounded weird to me turned out to be fraudulent.
Inner circles of official science don’t like that approach. They have their arcane language and their computer models and their projections all dressed up in obscure formulae---and they protect that territory. They don’t want intrusion.
“We know. You wouldn’t be able to understand it. Let us do our work.”
That used to fly, but not so much anymore.
The walls are coming down.
JON RAPPOPORT
www.insolutions.info
www.nomorefakenews.com
