By Dana Ullman
Big Pharma, Big Bucks, and the Guise of Science
'Adherents of conventional medicine have consistently asserted that its methods are scientifically verified, and they have ridiculed other methods that are suggested to have therapeutic or curative effects. In fact, conventional physicians have consistently worked to disallow competitors, even viciously attacking those in their own profession who have questioned conventional treatments or provided alternative modalities. More recently, medical organizations simply work with insurance companies to help them determine what should and shouldn't get reimbursed, a clever way to kill competition bloodlessly.
And yet, strangely enough, whatever has been in vogue in conventional medicine in one decade has been declared ineffective, dangerous and sometimes barbaric in the ensuing decades. Surprisingly, despite this pattern in history, proponents and defenders of "scientific medicine" tend to have little or no humility, continually asserting that today's cure is truly effective ... and in any case, strongly asserting that any "alternatives" to this ever-changing treatment are quackery, sheer quackery, whether they know anything about these alternative treatment modalities or not.'
Read more...
Related Post:
allopathic medicine is unscientific
- Bad Day? Try Fukitol
- Routine Early Cord Clamping Harms Newborns: No Evidence of Benefit Ever Existed
- Allopathic Doctors Don't Know How to Work with or Take Care of an Immune System
- Evidence Based Medicine Is a Fraud. Here’s Why.
- Evidence-Based Medicine: Neither Good Evidence nor Good Medicine
- THE WORST CRIME OF THE 20TH CENTURY
- The Dark Ages of Medicine
- Placebo: The Foundation Upon Which Medicine Rests Has No Standard
dana Ullman
Widget by [ Iptek-4u ]
