Showing posts with label fake mainstream journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fake mainstream journalism. Show all posts

Thinking Outside the Processed Foods Box—Health and Safety Advantages of Organic Food



'I have enjoyed a virtually exclusive organic diet for the past 30 years. But I was deeply unsettled by a September 4 New York Times article and a similar Associated Press story casting doubt on the value of an organic diet.

In terms of the extra cost and value of eating organically, I have always subscribed to the adage "pay now or pay later." While my personal experience does not provide much in terms of a scientifically legitimate sample size, in the last 30 years, after suffering from pesticide poisoning prompted my shift to an organic diet, I have exceeded my insurance deductible only once, due to an orthopedic injury. And my doctor keeps telling me how remarkable it is that I, at age 57, have no chronic health problems and take no pharmaceuticals.'


Read more...




>>>READ MORE

'Investigative' Journalist Paid Off By Big Pharma










'I watched Brian Deer’s appearance on Anderson Cooper 360, the one where he closed his eyes for extended periods of time when Anderson asked him certain tough questions, and kept wondering to myself, “Who IS this guy?”


The answers are coming in fast and hard as to who Brian Deer really is, and I must say I am thoroughly astonished at how badly many major news outlets, particularly CNN and Anderson Cooper, failed the US viewing audience by giving this one journalist, without doing background on him or talking to the Lancet 12 parents, such a platform to falsely reassure American parents. The more I learn about this guy, the weirder it gets. This is a long one, so apologies in advance.

Here’s what we’ve learned about Brian Deer.'


Read more...
>>>READ MORE

Mental Health: Thought Control and Cognitive Dissonance in 'Free Societies'

'In societies which like to call themselves open and free, liberty is usually defined in contrasting terms. State propaganda and indoctrination, for example, are said to be exclusive characteristics of unfree or totalitarian states at both ends of the ideological spectrum.

One danger of defining our society in opposition to less desirable 'others' is that it relieves us of the burden of internal scrutiny and introspection. It is reassuring to know that other communities are demonstrably less privileged than ours but it can also lead us to complacent assumptions about our own capacity for free thought and expression.

George Orwell offered an explanation of how thought control also operated in liberal democracies. In an unpublished introduction to Animal Farm Orwell warned that "the sinister fact about literary censorship in England is that it is largely voluntary. Unpopular ideas can be silenced, and inconvenient facts kept dark, without any need for an "official ban."


Read more...


'Even the names of the four Ministries by which we are governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts.


The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war.

The Ministry of Truth with lies.

The Ministry of Love with torture.

And the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.


These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.
For it is only by reconciling contradictions that power can be retained indefinitely. In no other way could the ancient cycle be broken. If human equality is to be for ever averted — if the High, as we have called them, are to keep their places permanently — then the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity.'
George Orwell 1984





>>>READ MORE