Showing posts with label Avoiding GMO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Avoiding GMO. Show all posts

'Consider the following scenario:

Foreign genes are introduced to the human body via GMOs, which our bodies do not recognize and attack as foreign invaders. These same foreign invaders were designed to transfer between genomes, so the ones that survive do what they were designed to do and incorporate into the human genome.

What we now have is a recipe for an increase in mutations via horizontal gene transfer the likes of which no one has ever seen due to spontaneous changes by genetically engineered DNA ... '

Read more...
>>>READ MORE

Whole Foods’ SICKENING TRICKS




'In a Whole Foods store not far from the corporate headquarters, a customer did the unthinkable.  They showed pictures of the rats in the Criigen study to a few other WF customers (all of whom were grateful and asked for the link).  

They had brought their computer with the photos into the store to show management how serious GMOs are because despite being asked for a year, management had not removed the GMO canola oil from the items they make in the store.

Here is what the customer showed other customers.'






CRIIGEN Study Rats. Explosive results contradict biotech claims of safety.


Read more...
>>>READ MORE

“Right 2 Know” march — citizens are demanding GMO foods be labeled now


'Together Let’s Demand GMO Labeling Now! 

Most Americans agree we have a right to know what’s in our food, and a right to choose safe, healthy food for our families and ourselves. And yet 80% of the packaged foods in America contain Genetically Engineered ingredients that have not been proven safe, and are not labeled!'

Read more...
>>>READ MORE

IT'S TIME FOR A FOOD FIGHT



IT'S TIME FOR A FOOD FIGHT from NO GMO on Vimeo.




>>>READ MORE

Monsanto GM corn harvest fails massively in South Africa

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/19/article-0-00EE0C9300000578-305_468x314.jpg


'South African farmers suffered millions of dollars in lost income when 82,000 hectares of genetically-manipulated corn (maize) failed to produce hardly any seeds.The plants look lush and healthy from the outside. Monsanto has offered compensation. 

Monsanto blames the failure of the three varieties of corn planted on these farms, in three South African provinces, on alleged ‘underfertilisation processes in the laboratory”. Some 280 of the 1,000 farmers who planted the three varieties of Monsanto corn this year, have reported extensive seedless corn problems. Urgent investigation demanded.'

Read more ...
>>>READ MORE

Canada Okays GMO Wheat!

http://www.twentyandchange.com/laurascountryoven/img/bread%20in%20basket.gif

'Canada is giving the go ahead to GMO wheat. Although it is not ready for production yet, the plans are set: The National Research Council plans to develop genetically modified wheat in Canada — a measure long resisted by the country’s wheat farmers. The NRC says Canadian wheat farmers are becoming less productive and need to adapt, especially in the face of climate change. It suggests GM wheat as a solution.' 

Read more...
>>>READ MORE

Move Over GMO Alfalfa, Here Come the Beets

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/ReSizes/OriginalWatermarked/PageFiles/25653/monsanto-no-food.jpg




by Barbara H. Peterson
 Farm Wars

'I didn’t want to be right on this. I was hoping that I was wrong, but it looks like it is playing out just as I thought it would. Here come genetically modified (GM) sugar beets right on the heels of GM alfalfa.' 

USDA partially deregulating biotech sugar beets KANSAS CITY/WASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters) – 

'U.S. agricultural regulators on Friday said despite a court ban, they would allow commercial planting of genetically modified sugar beets under closely controlled conditions while they complete a full environmental impact statement. The move marks the second-such boost by the United States for contested biotech crops in a week, and underscores U.S. determination to expand the use of GMO crops amid rising global fears over food security and surging prices. After approving genetically altered alfalfa last week in the face of bitter protest and after court rulings against an earlier sugar beet approval, the U.S. Department of Agriculture said it would allow Monsanto Co’s (MON.N) “Roundup Ready” sugar beets back in the fields this spring.' (Reuters)


Read more...
>>>READ MORE

October is Non-GMO Month




By Dr. Mercola


'Together we CAN get GMOs banned from the US. Europe was able to do it over a decade ago without any government assistance. All they did was educate the consumers, and that was enough pressure on the food industry to drop their ploys.

If we band together as an effective army we will be able to do this. Please understand that the VAST majority of people in the US do not want GM foods, so this is an EASY battle to win. All we have to do is a bit of organizational work.

So let me tell you how we are going to achieve the removal of GMOs in the US.

October is Non-GMO Month, and you've been receiving a lot of important information about genetically engineered foods this week.
Tomorrow, October 10th (10/10/10) is Non-GMO Day, so I'm pleased to bring back Jeffrey Smith, the real leader behind this movement to eliminate GM foods from the US market, for another interview.

This month, Jeffrey's organization, Institute for Responsible Technology, is launching a plan to bring their message to the necessary numbers of people to create a tipping point that can effectively drive GM foods off the market. Nearly 400 retail stores selling natural products around the country are already actively promoting the information about choosing healthier non-GMO products.

I'm thrilled to be part of this movement, and I strongly urge you join us.'


Read more...
>>>READ MORE

Why We Need Mandatory GMO Food Labels



 '* Only 26% of the U.S. public understands that most junk foods and animal products contain GMO ingredients.

* The FDA is moving fast to approve a brave new world of GMO foods, including genetically engineered animals like Frankenfish, the eel-like-ocean-pout-chinook-Atlantic-salmon mix.


* Genetically modified foods are less nutritious, more likely to trigger an allergy, and contain higher levels of growth hormones and pesticides. Yet GM foods aren't required to be rigorously tested for food safety before they end up in grocery stores and restaurants.'



Read more... 
>>>READ MORE
How To Identify And Avoid GMO Foods




Recent polls across the world have consistently shown that, if they had a choice, 90% of people would actively seek to avoid GMOs (genetically modified organisms) in their food.

Unfortunately, GMOs are taking over our farmland so quickly, it is virtually impossible to avoid eating GM foods... unless you know what to look for.

HOW TO AVOID GMO FOODS:


1. Look at the stickers on fruit - there is a PLU code with either 4 or 5 numbers. If your fruit's label has 4 numbers, it is conventionally grown. 5 numbers starting with a 9 means it was organically grown, and 5 numbers starting with an 8 means GMO.

2. Buy local & talk to your farmers - this is the best way to ensure you're eating real foods. It's estimated that up to 85% of pre-packaged and processed foods contain GMOs, so buying fresh from the farm is a great way to avoid that.

3. Avoid the Top Four GMO Crops of Soy, Corn, Canola and Cottonseed - most blended oils in North America contain canola and cottonseed. Replacing these with 100% extra virgin olive oil is a safe alternative.

4. Encourage your favorite food providers to label their food GMO-free. We don't need the government to force companies to label their foods, and we're seeing more and more that we as consumers have tremendous power, and if enough of us ask for GMO-free labels, and support the companies that use them, we'll see a huge increase in labeling. And we're already starting to see this.

Get to know the companies that are labeling their foods GMO-free.

5. Buy Organically Grown Food - For now, the organic certification process is a relatively safe bet to ensure your food is free of GMOs, although this may not be the case in the future. Help support global sustainability by purchasing certified organically grown food.

6. Conventional Sugar - Over 90% of this year's sugar beet harvest will be Monsanto's GM Roundup-Ready Sugar Beet. That means if you are using sugar, or eating anything with sugar in it, you're eating GMOs.

7. Grow your own food - Plant a garden using heirloom seeds! (thanks to Amy31415 on YouTube for pointing out this important tip!)

Organic Certifications, Labels, and What They Mean


0100organic_produce


There seems to be a lot of confusion about what that “organic” sign in the grocery store means. For many of us, it merely means “same stuff, higher price.” Most Americans are aware that our produce in the grocery store has to meet specific requirements in order to be able to display the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s seal and use the word “organic” on their label.

The most vocal critique of the USDA’s organic certification is in what is considered “organic” and what is not. The mandatory participation requirement is also a big one.

usda-organic-seal

That second issue is probably the greatest one, since just using the word “organic” on your product label requires that you comply with all USDA requirements before being able to state that your product is “organic.” In other words, the USDA has the power over that one word and ultimately decides what is and what isn’t defined as “organic.”

This presents a huge obstacle. Under the law, anyone selling foods and labeling them “organic” must comply with the USDA’s record keeping and onerous compliance rules. Even non-USDA certification groups for food production aren’t allowed the name “organic” unless they are part of the USDA’s system.

This means that alternative labeling certification groups, like the Certified Naturally Grown certification alliance, cannot use “organic” in their very name.

This brings to question how the costly government certification requirements can be considered the right choice for giving consumers confidence that what they’re buying is really “organic.” Since the system favors huge operations over smaller, more localized ones, it’s obviously weighted in favor of factory farms (which can be organic certified) and Big Agra.

Further, because the certification and the very use of the word “organic” is now politically controlled, it’s possible for lobbyists and insiders to manipulate how the certification is done or the requirements for it. This leads to questions of how organic those things labeled “organic” really are.

In 2005, for instance, an appropriations bill for the USDA allowed 38 synthetic ingredients to be considered “organic” when certifying foods for the USDA Organic label. Among the beneficiaries was Anheuser-Busch (Budweiser), who now use the organic label on their Wild Hop Lager.

The control of the word “organic” allows the USDA and its subsidiaries to decide who does and who doesn’t get to use this valuable marketing term. Ostensibly, of course, this means that nefarious companies who’ll use the word wrongly to get more buyers will not be able to use the term. It also means, however, that small businesses and farmers (even home gardeners) who sell their organic wares can’t call them that either.

cng-label

In my mind, I have to wonder why groups like Certified Naturally Grown aren’t allowed to use the word “organic” with their members when they withhold their label for only the most stringent of organic practices.

Small farms and food makers who wish to use the CNG label are required to not only keep their operations at the highest of organic standards, but are randomly audited by other members in the CNG to ensure that they are doing so.

By comparison, a USDA Certified Organic operation must keep costly and tedious records from seed to harvest, must pay for organization membership and for all inspections, etc. This is costly and works only for large-scale commercial operations, but for smaller operations—especially those that do not focus on one or two crops, but grow several—this is quite onerous.

Further, seed-saving and similar practices are not allowed under the USDA’s program unless the farmer doing so is also a certified seed supplier. Even if it’s just for their own use!

CNG farmers follow the same basic rules of the USDA program, but the record keeping can be tailored to meet their needs. Further, their farms are required to be open to public access (full time or by appointment) to allow any consumer or interested party to also come to the farm and see operations. This encourages public discourse on the CNG certification and also allows consumers to see where their groceries are coming from. Most CNG participating farms agree that this actually increases sales and local consumer interest in their operations.

organic-hops

Finally, the CNG runs entirely on free-will donations and volunteer, grassroots efforts. The USDA is a government-mandated, forced participation edict. Not only does this give the USDA full ownership of the word “organic,” but it gives them the power to decide how it’s defined and who gets to use it.

You tell me which you think is better.

Find out more about the Certified Natural Growers Association



Campaign For Healthier Eating In America

Non-GMO Shopping Guide

CenterforFoodSafety.org

Visit websites that support non-GM foods and farmers:

Localharvest.org

Vegtv.com





>>>READ MORE